[Mobile health in primary care. New challenges in the development of solutions to promote physical activity and well-being]. / La salud móvil en atención primaria. Nuevos desafíos en el desarrollo de soluciones para promover la actividad física y el bienestar.

The use of smart devices such as mobile phones (smartphones) or smart watches (smartwatch) to promote physical activity and well-being has increased in recent years among patients and professionals in primary care. This change is driven by the access of patients and professionals to a large catalog of health applications, which can complement the provision of services and promote the empowerment of patients in their own health and lifestyles. These applications are beginning to be integrated with areas such as Artificial Intelligence (AI), the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) and data storage in the cloud, among other emerging technological systems, offering a new complementary approach to clinical practice known so far. Despite the great potential, there are numerous limitations and major challenges for its full implementation in clinical practice.

Estudio transversal multicéntrico sobre la prevalencia de delirium en unidades de ortogeriatría: protocolo de «Estudio DELFRA 24» / Multicenter cross-sectional study on the prevalence of delirium in orthogeriatric units: «DELFRA 24 study» protocol

Introducción El delirium es la complicación perioperatoria más frecuente en el adulto mayor con fractura de cadera (FC) conllevando un impacto catastrófico en su recuperación funcional y su estado cognitivo. Actualmente se desconoce la prevalencia real de este síndrome ya que no está protocolizada su detección y abordaje en la práctica clínica habitual. Métodos Se realizará un estudio observacional multicéntrico de tipo transversal a nivel nacional en el que participarán distintas unidades de ortogeriatría de España. Se evaluará la prevalencia de delirium con la escala 4AT, así como las características de este y su relación con otros síndromes geriátricos, variables sociodemográficas, características de la cirugía y parámetros analíticos. Resultados La recogida de datos se llevará a cabo el próximo día mundial del delirium (miércoles 13 de marzo de 2024), por lo que los resultados se esperan durante el segundo o tercer trimestre del año 2024. Conclusiones Conocer la prevalencia real y las características del delirium en mayores con FC podría contribuir a sensibilizar en la detección sistemática, la prevención y el abordaje protocolizado del delirium en servicios quirúrgicos, disminuyendo el impacto de sus consecuencias. (AU)

Introduction Delirium is the most common perioperative complication in older adults with hip fracture (HF), leading to a catastrophic impact on their functional recovery and cognitive status. Currently, the true prevalence of this syndrome is unknown as its detection and management are not standardized in clinical practice. Methods A multicenter observational cross-sectional study will be conducted nationwide, involving different orthogeriatric units in Spain. The prevalence of delirium will be assessed using the 4AT scale, along with its characteristics and its relationship with other geriatric syndromes, sociodemographic variables, surgical characteristics, and laboratory parameters. Results Data collection is scheduled to take place on World Delirium Day (Wednesday, March 13, 2024), and therefore, the results are expected during the second or third quarter of 2024. Conclusions Understanding the real prevalence and characteristics of delirium in older adults with HF could contribute to the development of strategies for its detection and management, reducing the impact of its consequences. (AU)

Estudio transversal multicéntrico sobre la prevalencia de delirium en unidades de ortogeriatría: protocolo de «Estudio DELFRA 24» / Multicenter cross-sectional study on the prevalence of delirium in orthogeriatric units: «DELFRA 24 study» protocol

Introducción El delirium es la complicación perioperatoria más frecuente en el adulto mayor con fractura de cadera (FC) conllevando un impacto catastrófico en su recuperación funcional y su estado cognitivo. Actualmente se desconoce la prevalencia real de este síndrome ya que no está protocolizada su detección y abordaje en la práctica clínica habitual. Métodos Se realizará un estudio observacional multicéntrico de tipo transversal a nivel nacional en el que participarán distintas unidades de ortogeriatría de España. Se evaluará la prevalencia de delirium con la escala 4AT, así como las características de este y su relación con otros síndromes geriátricos, variables sociodemográficas, características de la cirugía y parámetros analíticos. Resultados La recogida de datos se llevará a cabo el próximo día mundial del delirium (miércoles 13 de marzo de 2024), por lo que los resultados se esperan durante el segundo o tercer trimestre del año 2024. Conclusiones Conocer la prevalencia real y las características del delirium en mayores con FC podría contribuir a sensibilizar en la detección sistemática, la prevención y el abordaje protocolizado del delirium en servicios quirúrgicos, disminuyendo el impacto de sus consecuencias. (AU)

Introduction Delirium is the most common perioperative complication in older adults with hip fracture (HF), leading to a catastrophic impact on their functional recovery and cognitive status. Currently, the true prevalence of this syndrome is unknown as its detection and management are not standardized in clinical practice. Methods A multicenter observational cross-sectional study will be conducted nationwide, involving different orthogeriatric units in Spain. The prevalence of delirium will be assessed using the 4AT scale, along with its characteristics and its relationship with other geriatric syndromes, sociodemographic variables, surgical characteristics, and laboratory parameters. Results Data collection is scheduled to take place on World Delirium Day (Wednesday, March 13, 2024), and therefore, the results are expected during the second or third quarter of 2024. Conclusions Understanding the real prevalence and characteristics of delirium in older adults with HF could contribute to the development of strategies for its detection and management, reducing the impact of its consequences. (AU)

[Multicenter cross-sectional study on the prevalence of delirium in orthogeriatric units: «DELFRA 24 study¼ protocol]. / Estudio transversal multicéntrico sobre la prevalencia de delirium en unidades de ortogeriatría: protocolo de «Estudio DELFRA 24¼.

INTRODUCTION: Delirium is the most common perioperative complication in older adults with hip fracture (HF), leading to a catastrophic impact on their functional recovery and cognitive status. Currently, the true prevalence of this syndrome is unknown as its detection and management are not standardized in clinical practice. METHODS: A multicenter observational cross-sectional study will be conducted nationwide, involving different orthogeriatric units in Spain. The prevalence of delirium will be assessed using the 4AT scale, along with its characteristics and its relationship with other geriatric syndromes, sociodemographic variables, surgical characteristics, and laboratory parameters. RESULTS: Data collection is scheduled to take place on World Delirium Day (Wednesday, March 13, 2024), and therefore, the results are expected during the second or third quarter of 2024. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the real prevalence and characteristics of delirium in older adults with HF could contribute to the development of strategies for its detection and management, reducing the impact of its consequences.

Impact of major osteoporotic fractures on the use of healthcare resources in Catalonia, Spain.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the impact of first major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) on health resource use and healthcare expenditures in people aged ≥50 years in Catalonia, Spain. DESIGN: Observational, retrospective study. The Catalan Health Surveillance System (CHSS) registry was used to obtain sociodemographic, clinical and expenditure data from all public centres in Catalonia (Spain). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Males and females aged ≥50 years who sustained a first major osteoporotic fracture between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020. METHODS: Data on admissions to the emergency department, hospitalization and skilled nursing facilities, primary and specialized care visits, nonemergency medical transport, outpatient rehabilitation and pharmacy prescriptions were retrieved for each patient. Monthly and yearly mean usage rates, expenditure in euros (€) and incremental costs one and two years after fracture were calculated. RESULTS: There were 64,403 patients with first MOF: 47,555 females and 16,848 males with a mean age (standard deviation) of 76.5 (12.0) years. The average annual expenditure increased from €4564 in the year before to €12,331 in the year following a hip fracture. For forearm fractures, the expenditure increased from €2511 to €4251, for vertebral fractures from €4146 to €6659, for pelvic fractures from €4442 to €7124, for humerus fractures from €3058 to €5992, and for multiple fractures from €4598 to €12,028. The average cost for overall fractures experienced a 110.3 % increase. The leading cause of health expenditure in the year following MOF was hospital admission. Expenditure in the second year post-fracture returned to pre-fracture levels. The use of some healthcare resources, especially visits to emergency services, increased in the prefracture month. Male sex, older age and high previous comorbidities were associated with a higher expenditure. CONCLUSIONS: In people with a first MOF, healthcare expenditure doubled during the first-year post-facture, mostly in relation to inpatient care. The healthcare resource use increased during the previous month. This increase could potentially be attributed to the worsening of pre-existing comorbidities.

A Delphi consensus on the management of Spanish patients with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture: OSARIDELPHI study.

The OSARIDELPHI study evaluated the level of agreement between specialists in osteoporosis regarding the management of patients with high-risk fractures in Spain. The results provide expert-based recommendations for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment related to fracture risk. Therefore, the study facilitates clinical decision-making for managing this patient's profile. PURPOSE: To evaluate the level of agreement between specialists in osteoporosis regarding the management of patients with high-risk fractures in Spain. METHODS: A two-round Delphi study was performed using an online survey. In round 1, panel members rated their level of agreement with assessments on a 9-point Likert scale. Item selection was based on acceptance by ≥ 66.6% of panel experts and the agreement of the scientific committee. In round 2, the same panelists evaluated non-consensus items in round 1. RESULTS: A total of 80 panelists participated in round 1; of these, 78 completed the round 2 survey. In round 1, 122 items from 4 dimensions (definition of fracture risk: 11 items, prevention and diagnosis: 38 items, choice of treatment: 24 items, and treatment-associated quality of life: 49 items) were evaluated. The consensus was reached for 90 items (73.8%). Panelists agreed that categorizing high risk, very high risk, or imminent risk determines secondary prevention actions (97.5%). Experts agreed that treatment with bone-forming drugs should be considered in case of a very high risk of fracture, and a sequential change to antiresorptive drugs should be made after 1-2 years (97.5%). Panelists also recommended corrective action plans for non-adherent patients to improve adherence (97.5%). A total of 131 items were finally accepted after round 2. CONCLUSION: This Delphi study provides expert-based recommendations on clinical decision-making for managing patients with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture.

Situación de las Unidades de Recuperación Funcional en ortogeriatría según datos del Registro Nacional de Fractura de Cadera / Functional recovery units state in orthogeriatrics according to data from the National Registry of Hip Fracture

Introducción El Registro Nacional de Fracturas de Cadera (RNFC) facilita el conocimiento del proceso de la fractura de cadera en España tanto para los clínicos como para los gestores y favorece la reducción de la variabilidad de los resultados encontrados incluyendo el destino al alta tras la fractura de cadera. Objetivo Describir la utilización de Unidades de Recuperación Funcional (URF) por parte de los pacientes con fractura de cadera incluidos en el RNFC y comparar los resultados entre las diferentes comunidades autónomas (CC.AA.). Material y métodos Se trata de un estudio observacional, prospectivo y multicéntrico de varios hospitales de España. Se analizaron los datos de una cohorte del RNFC de pacientes ingresados con fractura de cadera entre 2017 y 2022, centrándose en la ubicación al alta de los pacientes, en concreto en el traslado a URF. Resultados De una muestra de 52.215 pacientes procedentes de 105 hospitales, 9540 pacientes (18,1%) se trasladaron a URF al alta y 4595 (8,8%) permanecían en estas unidades 30 días después, con una distribución variable entre las distintas CC.AA. (0-49%) y con resultados variables en deterioro funcional a los 30 días (12,2-41,9%). Conclusiones En el paciente ortogeriátrico existe una disponibilidad y utilización desigual de las URF entre las distintas CC.AA. El estudio de la utilidad de este recurso puede ser de gran valor para la toma de decisiones en políticas de salud (AU)

Introduction The National Registry of Hip Fractures (RNFC) facilitates knowledge of hip fracture process in Spain to clinicians and managers and is useful to the reduction of the results variability, including the destination at discharge after the hip fracture. Objective The aim of this study was to describe functional recovery units (URFs) use for patients with hip fracture included in the RNFC and to compare the results of the different autonomous communities (AC). Material and methods An observational, prospective and multicenter study of several hospitals in Spain. Data from a RNFC cohort of patients admitted with hip fracture between 2017 and 2022 were analyzed, focusing on the location at discharge of the patients, specifically on transfer to the URF. Results 52,215 patients from 105 hospitals were analyzed, 9540 patients (18.1%) were transferred to URF upon discharge and 4595 (8.8%) remained in these units 30 days later, with a variable distribution between the different AC (0–49%) and variability of results in patients not recovering ambulation at 30 days (12.2–41.9%). Conclusions There is in orthogeriatric patient an unequal availability and use of URFs between different autonomous communities. The study of the usefulness of this resource can be of great value for decision-making in health policies (AU)

[Functional recovery units state in orthogeriatrics according to data from the National Registry of Hip Fracture]. / Situación de las Unidades de Recuperación Funcional en ortogeriatría según datos del Registro Nacional de Fractura de Cadera.

INTRODUCTION: The National Registry of Hip Fractures (RNFC) facilitates knowledge of hip fracture process in Spain to clinicians and managers and is useful to the reduction of the results variability, including the destination at discharge after the hip fracture. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe functional recovery units (URFs) use for patients with hip fracture included in the RNFC and to compare the results of the different autonomous communities (AC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: An observational, prospective and multicenter study of several hospitals in Spain. Data from a RNFC cohort of patients admitted with hip fracture between 2017 and 2022 were analyzed, focusing on the location at discharge of the patients, specifically on transfer to the URF. RESULTS: 52,215 patients from 105 hospitals were analyzed, 9540 patients (18.1%) were transferred to URF upon discharge and 4595 (8.8%) remained in these units 30 days later, with a variable distribution between the different AC (0-49%) and variability of results in patients not recovering ambulation at 30 days (12.2-41.9%). CONCLUSIONS: There is in orthogeriatric patient an unequal availability and use of URFs between different autonomous communities. The study of the usefulness of this resource can be of great value for decision-making in health policies.

Spanish National Registry of Major Osteoporotic Fractures (REFRA) seen at Fracture Liaison Services (FLS): objectives and quality standards.

REFRA-FLS is a new registry in Spain aimed at identifying individuals over 50 years of age with a fragility fracture. Using this registry, we found hip fracture is the most prevalent fracture. Treatment for osteoporosis was 87.7%, with 65.3% adherence. REFRA-FLS provides fundamental data in the study of fragility fractures. PURPOSE: Fragility fractures are a growing public health concern in modern-aged societies. Fracture Liaison Services (FLS) have been shown to successfully lower rates of secondary fractures. A new registry (REFRA-FLS) has been created to monitor quality indicators of FLS units in Spain and to explore the occurrence and characteristic of fragility fractures identified by these centers. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study based on fragility fractures recorded in the REFRA-FLS registry. Participants were individuals 50 years or above who suffered a low energy fragility fracture identified by the 10 participating FLS units during the study period. The type of FLS unit, the characteristics of the individuals at baseline, along with patient outcomes as quality indicators among those who completed 1 year of follow-up were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 2965 patients and 3067 fragility fractures were identified, and the most frequent locations were hip (n = 1709, 55.7%) and spine (n = 492, 16.0%). A total of 43 refractures (4.5%) and 46 deaths (4.9%) were observed among 948 individuals in the follow-up analyses. Time from fracture to evaluation was less than 3 months in 76.7% of individuals. Osteoporosis treatment was prescribed in 87.7%, and adherence was 65.3% in Morisky-Green test. CONCLUSION: Our results provide a comprehensive picture of fragility fractures identified in FLS units from Spain. Overall, quality indicators are satisfactory although a much higher use of DXA would be desirable. As the registry grows with the incorporation of new FLS units and longer follow-up, incoming analyses will provide valuable insight.

[Spanish National Hip Fracture Registry (RNFC): First-year results and comparison with other registries and prospective multi-centric studies from Spain]. / Registro Nacional de Fracturas de Cadera (RNFC): resultados del primer año y comparación con otros registros y estudios multicéntricos españoles.

OBJECTIVE: The Spanish National Hip Fracture Registry (Registro Nacional de Fracturas de Cadera or RNFC) is a Spanish, prospective, multi- centric registry, commenced in 2017. The goal of this paper is to present the data from the first annual report and to compare them with autonomic registries and recent prospective multi-centric studies performed in Spain. METHODS: We included persons 75 years or older treated for fragility hip fractures in any of the centers participating in the RNFC between January and October 2017. The descriptive statistics of each variable used the mean (and standard deviation) or the median (and interquartile ranges) for the ordinal variables and the percentage for the categoric variables. A descriptive analysis of the casemix was performed and compared with available data from the aforementioned studies. RESULTS: The RNFC included 7.208 patients from 54 hospitals, with a mean age of 86.7 (SD 5.6) years; 75.4% were women, and 36.4% showed cognitive decline. Mean surgical delay was 75.7 (SD 63.6) hours, and length of stay averaged 10.9 (SD 6.7) days. Of the patients who lived at home (75.4%), less than half (37.0%) returned home at discharge. One-month mortality was 7.1%. Comparison with other studies showed important differences, especially regarding patients newly sent to nursing homes (7.7-29.4%) and with antiosteoporotic treatment at discharge (14.5-36.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The RNFC is the largest prospective database to date that offers data regarding the characteristics of patients hospitalized for hip fractures in Spain. Comparison with recent studies showed some important differences.

OBJETIVO: El Registro Nacional de Fracturas de Cadera (RNFC) es un registro español multicéntrico, prospectivo y continuo, que comenzó en 2017. El objetivo de este artículo fue presentar los datos del primer informe anual y compararlos con los registros autonómicos y los estudios multicéntricos realizados recientemente en España. METODOS: Se incluyeron las personas de 75 años o más atendidas con el diagnóstico de fractura de cadera por fragilidad en alguno de los hospitales participantes en el RNFC, entre enero y octubre de 2017. En el análisis estadístico se utilizó la media y desviación estándar o mediana y rangos intercuartílicos para las variables numéricas y los porcentajes para las variables categóricas. Se realizó un análisis descriptivo global de la casuística y se comparó con los datos disponibles de los estudios previos mencionados. RESULTADOS: Se registraron 7.208 personas de 54 hospitales, con una edad media de 86,7 años (DE 5,6). El 75,4% fueron mujeres y el 36,4% presentaron deterioro cognitivo previo. La demora quirúrgica media fue de 75,7 horas (DE 63,6) y la estancia media fue de 10,9 días (DE 6,7). De las personas que vivían en un domicilio antes de la fractura (75,4%), menos de la mitad (37,0%) volvieron a él tras el alta hospitalaria. Al mes, había fallecido el 7,1%. La comparación con los otros estudios mostró algunas diferencias importantes, sobre todo en la ubicación previa, en el porcentaje de pacientes institucionalizados de novo (7,7-29,4%) y en el porcentaje con tratamiento antiosteoporótico al alta (14,5-36,7%). CONCLUSIONES: El RNFC es la mayor base de datos prospectiva que aporta datos sobre el perfil de los pacientes hospitalizados por fractura de cadera en España. La comparación con otros estudios recientes muestra algunas diferencias importantes.

Registro Nacional de Fracturas de Cadera (RNFC): resultados del primer año y comparación con otros registros y estudios multicéntricos españoles / Spanish National Hip Fracture Registry (RNFC):First-year results and comparison with other registries and prospective multi-centric studies from Spain

OBJETIVO: El Registro Nacional de Fracturas de Cadera (RNFC) es un registro español multicéntrico, prospectivo y continuo, que comenzó en 2017. El objetivo de este artículo fue presentar los datos del primer informe anual y compararlos con los registros autonómicos y los estudios multicéntricos realizados recientemente en España. MÉTODOS: Se incluyeron las personas de 75 años o más atendidas con el diagnóstico de fractura de cadera por fragilidad en alguno de los hospitales participantes en el RNFC, entre enero y octubre de 2017. En el análisis estadístico se utilizó la media y desviación estándar o mediana y rangos intercuartílicos para las variables numéricas y los porcentajes para las variables categóricas. Se realizó un análisis descriptivo global de la casuística y se comparó con los datos disponibles de los estudios previos mencionados. RESULTADOS: Se registraron 7.208 personas de 54 hospitales, con una edad media de 86,7 años (DE 5,6). El 75,4% fueron mujeres y el 36,4% presentaron deterioro cognitivo previo. La demora quirúrgica media fue de 75,7 horas (DE 63,6) y la estancia media fue de 10,9 días (DE 6,7). De las personas que vivían en un domicilio antes de la fractura (75,4%), menos de la mitad (37,0%) volvieron a él tras el alta hospitalaria. Al mes, había fallecido el 7,1%. La comparación con los otros estudios mostró algunas diferencias importantes, sobre todo en la ubicación previa, en el porcentaje de pacientes institucionalizados de novo (7,7-29,4%) y en el porcentaje con tratamiento antiosteoporótico al alta (14,5-36,7%). CONCLUSIONES: El RNFC es la mayor base de datos prospectiva que aporta datos sobre el perfil de los pacientes hospitalizados por fractura de cadera en España. La comparación con otros estudios recientes muestra algunas diferencias importantes

OBJECTIVE: The Spanish National Hip Fracture Registry (Registro Nacional de Fracturas de Cadera or RNFC) is a Spanish, prospective, multi-centric registry, commenced in 2017. The goal of this paper is to present the data from the first annual report and to compare them with autonomic registries and recent prospective multi-centric studies performed in Spain. METHODS: We included persons 75 years or older treated for fragility hip fractures in any of the centers participating in the RNFC between January and October 2017. The descriptive statistics of each variable used the mean (and standard deviation) or the median (and interquartile ranges) for the ordinal variables and the percentage for the categoric variables. A descriptive analysis of the casemix was performed and compared with available data from the aforementioned studies. RESULTS: The RNFC included 7.208 patients from 54 hospitals, with a mean age of 86.7 (SD 5.6) years; 75.4% were women, and 36.4% showed cognitive decline. Mean surgical delay was 75.7 (SD 63.6) hours, and length of stay averaged 10.9 (SD 6.7) days. Of the patients who lived at home (75.4%), less than half (37.0%) returned home at discharge. One-month mortality was 7.1%. Comparison with other studies showed important differences, especially regarding patients newly sent to nursing homes (7.7-29.4%) and with antiosteoporotic treatment at discharge (14.5-36.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The RNFC is the largest prospective database to date that offers data regarding the characteristics of patients hospitalized for hip fractures in Spain. Comparison with recent studies showed some important differences